The specimen is a macropterous female (see Fig. 1A), ca. 1 mm in length (incl. tegmina), light brown to fulvous in color; membranous part of tegmina almost transparent. Head slightly wider than long. Compound eyes well developed and large, ca. 0.04 mm wide dorsally (ratio to the minimal interocular distance ¼), 0.08 mm wide ventrally; an ocellus visible on each side medially from compound eye (Figs. 2A-3A). Rostrum only reaching hind margin of fore coxae, with first segment ca. 0.1 mm long and 0.07 mm wide, second ca. 0.05 mm long and 0.05 mm wide, third ca. 0.07 mm long, 0.05 mm wide at base, tapering; last segment ca. 0.07 mm long, even more tapering (Fig. 4A); second and third segments bear long setae on each side. First two antennal segments short and stout (first ca. 0.05 mm long and 0.03 mm wide, second ca. 0.1 mm long and 0.03 mm wide), segments three and four long and slender (third segment ca. 0.21 mm long and 0.016 mm wide, fourth ca. 0.2 mm long and 0.011 mm wide); antennae covered with setae especially long on last two segments; second antennal segment ca. 3.3 times longer than wide, third antennal segment ca. 13 times longer than wide; symmetrical pairs of long setae (most likely trichobothria for their length) present on fronto-clypeal region of head: one dorsally on each side of frons, two pairs on clypeus.

Pronotum almost three times as wide in posterior part as long in middle, trapeziform, with a large seta at each posterolateral angle and a concave posterior margin; anterior third incised on each side by a transversal furrow (not reaching each other and thus not forming a true collar), with a small dark spot in middle between them; scutellum large (ca. 0.26 mm wide and 0.1 mm long), triangular, slightly concave laterally.

Fore tibia somewhat widened distally, broad, two-segmented tarsi; middle tarsi also two-segmented, hind ones with three segments. All tibia distally with bristle combs (Figs. 3B, 4B).

Tegmina very difficult to observe because they are overlapping and the veins in the basal halves of the tegmina are phantom-like. Tegmen 0.8 mm long (Fig. 2B), exceeding body in length by ca. 0.25 mm; almost parallel in basal fourth, but with a flattened margin, between end of basal fourth till costal fracture, making outer margin of tegmen at this part slightly convex; costal fracture very pronounced and reaching middle part of tegmen; venation obscured in basal half; a claval fold clearly seen and a Y-shaped vein present in clavus, apparently not reaching wing basis; M vein also present, looking like a fold in basal half of tegmen (before claval fracture) and becoming a true vein in apical half; in this part, R and Cu veins also well visible; R fused with M just medially from costal fracture; Cu connected with M twice: distally by a crossvein and proximally by a fold; marginal vein reaching wing apex; hind wings well developed, surpassing tip of abdomen (Figs. 1A, 2A).

Lateral tergites of abdomen flattened; abdomen symmetrical, loculus capsulae not recognizable (Fig. 1B), unlike in Alpagut medius and A. maroccanus (Pluot-Sigwalt and Péricart, 2003); externally visible genitalia similar to female parts in modern Dipsocoridae; two conspicuous long setae (trichobothria?), with a row of a shorter setae between them on tip of abdomen (Fig. 5).

The modern Dipsocoridae live either on riverbanks inhabiting interstitial spaces formed by gravel and sand (Cryptostemma) or in mosses, especially those growing in bogs (Pachycoleus) (Heiss and Péricart, 2007 and Štys, 1990). These habitats are not optimal for the embedding of a specimen in fresh resin, which could explain, together with the very small size of these bugs, their rarity in amber.